Over the past few years the concerns have been raised about how bloggers conduct themselves online. The most notable was Tim O'Reilly’s call for a bloggers code of conduct. Some of the more traditional bloggers gave a significant amount of push back to the situation while others embraced it. I think that it is important that all corporate blogging companies establish their own rules of conduct as it pertains to blogging.

Here are the main points that should be included in the code of conduct:

  • As an individual and as a company taking responsibility for content fond on the blog
  • Take a stance for/against use of images and videos you might not have the full rights to
  • An explanation for your commenting policies – to you respond via email/post/comment and do you even approve comments when appropriate
  • Policy for approving or declining posts – what content is acceptableHow success is measured and tracked on the blogs
  • An explanation for how the content from the analytics on the blog are used and what they are

Dennis O'Reilly is writing about upgrading browsers in his Workers' Edge blog over at CNET News.com.  Quoting from the post we read (emphasis mine):
According to Net Applications, IE 6 accounted for more than 26 percent of the browser market in June 2008, while IE 7 was used by over 46 percent of all people on the Web. If your PC runs Windows 2000 or an earlier version of the OS, you can't upgrade to version 7 of IE. Unless your boss insists that you use the older version of the browser on XP or Vista, you've got no excuse for not upgrading to the safer IE 7.
As a blog company, browser market share is something we keep an eye on because it helps shape our testing policy.  We have to make sure that both our blogging features work properly on supported browsers and that blog pages look right on them.  We choose which browsers are supported based on market share.

I second O'Reilly's upgrading advice because not only will you get a more secure browser by leaving IE 6 behind, you will have a better web experience because IE 7 is much better at complying with web standards.

Charles Cooper at CNet's news.com website has a thought provoking article about commenter rights.  He mentions a blog post at Disqus' corporate weblog that proposes a bill of rights for comments.  Support for comments in business blogging software is important because it fosters one of the most important blogging benefits -- customer engagement.

I took a look at the list of rights he mentions, and while the question is interesting, I think that the scope of the rights as proposed verges on overkill.

A comment posting feature helps to encourage reader participation.  Where I think the commenter rights goes off the deep end is the implicit assumption the comment area is the sole venue by which the conversation must continue.  I think it is just one channel, and to make commenting as feature rich as proposed would turn a blog into a bulletin board where only one user is allowed to initiate a thread.

Rather than a complicated system of post, edit, track, and remove operations, backed with policies that determine whether an after-the-fact edit is OK, why can't we just live with a simple social contract?  A blogger shall allow comments from anyone.  A commenter is free to write what he or she wants.  Either party may delete the comment, but once the removal has been done, it's irreversible.  That saves the commenter from regret for posts written in the heat of the moment, and at the same time it prevents the airbrushing that Cooper worries about in his post.

In other words, the relationship between blogger and commenter is that of a host and a guest in a house.  The host invites guests, and has the right to dismiss them for bad behavior.

The question of comment ownership from a copyright standpoint is a bit tougher.  Of all the comments that I have left on blogs, I've never felt a sense of ownership in the sense that I thought a blogger would needto seek permission to republish my content.  If a reader is that passionate about retaining the right to determine whether the blogger can republish, he or she should probably write the comment as a full post on his or her own blog and then post a link in the comment section.

The level of discussion that the bill of rights has raised should give pause to companies rolling out a corporate weblog.  Let your readers speak freely and don't be too quick to decline comments.  Your customers may not always be right, but they are definitely worth listening to.

Southwest Airlines -- Opening up the Company

Southwest Airlines and RD2, the marketing organization behind Southwest's corporate blogging initiative, issued a press release this past week regarding some improvements to the airline's blog site, Nuts about Southwest.

Among some of the new features are podcasts, video, polling, and personalization.  To me the new features weren't as interesting as some of the statements that Southwest and RD2 made about the benefits that Southwest has derived since the original blogging initiative went live a couple year ago.  Quoting from the release:

Nuts About Southwest was originally launched as a means of giving Customers a look inside the Culture and operations of Southwest Airlines and allowing them to interact and build personal relationships with the airline's Employees. Over the last two years, the blog's function has evolved to also serve as a virtual focus group, assisting the Company through crisis and new product launches.

"From the debate over assigned seating to the timeframe in which we release our flight schedules, the passionate comments and opinions shared on our blog have unquestionably influenced several business decisions," says Rutherford. "But the primary focus of the blog remains our Employees and their personal interaction with our Customers."

The blog has cemented its role as a direct channel of communication with it's customers.  Moreover, the communication goes in both directions, providing the company with a richer portrait of customer satisfaction than could ever be accomplished with sterile multiple-choice surveys.

Another takeaway message is the importance of content.  Further on down in the release we read:
The airline estimates that it has reached more than 500,000 Customers through Nuts About Southwest alone, and they expect that number to exceed one million in 2008.
"It's not all about numbers, though," says Rutherford. "It's about the quality of the content, the conversations, and the engagement between Employees and Customers."
The enhanced organic search visibility from blogging is sustainable when you have a place that's worth visiting and using.  A blog of press releases won't do this, but letting your employees take the lead will.

Wells Fargo -- Opening up the Archives


Brands with historical significance are rare indeed.  Corporations with longevity oftentimes get merged or rebranded to the point that little of the original identity survives.

The railroad industry, which is a hobby of interest for me, is full of examples.  A wave of mergers in the late 60s and early 70s brought together the Chicago, Burlington & Qunicy, the Great Northern Railway, Northern Pacific Railway, and the Spokane, Portland & Seattle to create Burlington Northern.  In the mid 90s, that company merged with the Atchison, Topkea & Santa Fe to form the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway.  A couple of years ago, they decided to rebrand, dropping all of the names to the initials -- BNSF.

As a child, I remember seeing references to Wells Fargo stage coaches in westerns. Not until my adult years, as banks expanded to have a national presence, did I realize that Wells Fargo continued to exist as a bank out on the west coast.

Recognizing the significance of its heritage, Wells Fargo created a blog where historians and archivists write about the company's history.  Titled Guided by History, the blog profiles prominent figures and discusses how things were at the company in days gone by.  Some of the posts are remarkably candid, like a post that discusses the company's role in working with an nineteenth century immigration policy that was prejudiced against the Chinese.

Both Southwest and Wells Fargo provide compelling examples of how companies can find a voice and benefit through blogging.  While there are certainly things to avoid in executing a corporate blogging strategy, there is no one right way to blog.  In the case of these two companies, they leveraged their uniqueness.  It takes creativity, but it's certainly worth the long-term investment.


monster, job search, job descriptions, bloggingSo things have been busier than ever at Compendium...which has meant that our (my) blogging frequency has suffered.  With travel, new employees and continuous growth in our customer base blogging has taken a back seat...so I thought it would be interesting to bring back up the argument as to whether blogging should be an upfront job requirement? 

There are two schools of thought here --- one being that "you can't appoint a corporate blogger" and that you should let people blog at will per se.  This is great for the most part and many people within your organization will take to the idea of blogging, however, when the newness wears off and everyones job responsibilities get larger...where does blogging fall?   That's where the second argument comes into play, if you have decided to invest in a easy to use blogging software and search engine optimization is a priority for your company, then why should blogging be any different than traditional job responsibilities for your employees?  Here are Compendium we fall somewhere in between...and it works pretty well most of the time; but as our search terms get more competitive, I wonder if our relaxed policy of "try to do 2 posts a week" will continue to work?  What are your thoughts?  Where does your company fall?

While speaking with a few of my friends the other night, I was asked, "What exactly is a blog for." My dear, dear friend, who shall remain nameless, but will know I'm talking about him, mentioned that he thought blogs were strictly for banter, quick jabs and worst of all slander. He had been reading a lot about how companies utilize blogs to attack their competitors and had the notion that a blog could be more hurtful than helpful. I, being the level headed girl that I am, said, "Yes, but a blog is completely about emotion and how you handle that emotion toward your audience."
 
In the wonderful world of corporate blogging, you have to learn how to hold your tongue and respond to a competitors comments tactfully, making sure your not letting your anger get int the way of your writing. It's one thing to make a passionate point about the industry your in, but it's entirely another to post blatant slander towards a rival. Make sure you keep up with your companies policies and not "bad mouth."
Just keep saying to yourself, "Sticks and stones may break my bones, but blogs will never hurt me."

It's understandable businesses might be nervous about allowing their employees to maintain blogs.  Decision makers contemplating a corporate blogging strategy might be tempted to throw their hands up in the air and ask rhteorically, "Is it really worth the risk?

For those who might be baffled by this and similar questions, it helps to know that you are not the first to face these questions, and you are not alone.  In fact, you're in good company.

For a good case in point, check out a recently published article on CNet's news.com website. If you're considering an enterprise blog or are in the process of rolling one out, this article is a must-read.

CNet writer Ann Broache uses as a starting point the legal issues that Cisco Systems is facing after one of its employees was outed as an anonymous blogger.  The article does a good job of driving home the significance of transparency, discretion, and delineation. 

Transparency is ensuring that when employees post content related to their employer on the net, the employee clearly identifies him- or herself as an employee of that company.

Discretion means that employees don't disclose information that would compromise trade secrets, violate confidentiality agreements, or expose the company to further legal liability.

Delineation involves making clear what aspects of an employee's writings are representative of the company and which are the views of the employee alone.

The article also is valuable because it discusses how several large companies and organizations have dealt with this question.  Links to corporate blogging policies and net conduct guidelines for companies such as Cisco Systems, Sun Microsystems, Dell, Yahoo, IBM, Google, and the BBC are provided in the story.  With big names such as these, the story serves as a great launching point for identifying blog best practices.

One of the best ways to ensure transparency, delineation, and discretion is to provide a common corporate blogging platform like Compendium Blogware.  Employees get the ability to write original content while being clearly identified as a company employee.  Compendium's post approval feature helps mitigate the risk of inappropriate content.





A couple of recently published articles make an interesting point about the costliness of not blogging. 

On Wednesday, AppleInsider published a story about Apple's aversion to social networking and corporate blogging. Longtime employee and iChat architect Jens Alfke was quoted as having made the decision to leave Apple because it was becoming harder for him to develop social software.

The Mac maker rarely allows non-executives to present themselves as Apple employees in public and extends that policy to blogging. Even publicly available information is likely to face a challenge from a superior, Alfke says. While many blog anonymously, other firms often allow their employees to mention where they work and to discuss public projects. Some firms also go so far as to maintain official company blogs, such as Microsoft's Gamerscore Blog or smartphone maker Palm's official blog.

By contrast, Apple employees are often reluctant to write even after they leave, the software blogger explains.

Alfke goes on to decry the anti-blogging stance as "one of the least enlightened" in the industry.  If you read the comments you'll find plenty of readers who questioned whether Apple's closed culture really mattered because the company seemed to be doing so well in spite of it.

A recent blog posting by Patrick Altoft provides a powerful argument against Alfke's detractors by making a case for the marketing value of blogging.  He points to the impact on Apple's stock price in May 2007 after Engadget reported a rumors of a delay in the release of its iPhone.  Although the report was quickly discredited, Apple's share price dipped, resulting in the rapid loss of $4 billion in market capitalization. 

It was a costly, short-term problem that could have been easily avoided with clearer channels of communication, something that could have been fostered by developer blogs.  While it's true that Apple managed to recover, few companies out there have been able to match Apple's amazing streak of home runs over the past nine years.

If your company doesn't step up to tell it's story, someone else will do it for you, in a way that may not be favorable to your company.  Blogs allow your employees to provide a human angle that press releases and advertising simply cannot offer. 

While some companies, like Apple, might be able to resist blogging, not every company can count on slam dunks without end to get it right.  When viewed from this angle, corporate blogs look more and more like a wise investment.

I ran across this cartoon on bLaugh and thought I would share.  How many times have you ran across a "dead" blog...not updated for weeks, months or years...I always wonder, did they just simply run out of things to say? 

Business blogging is different --- while a teenager may stop loving Hannah Montana and stop updated her "I Love Hannah" blog or a political campaign will be over and therefore that candidate blog may die --- a corporate focused blog has no reason to end.  If you are still in business there is something to blog about...who is your latest client?  What are the upcoming changes for your product?  What are the industry trends and news?  How does the news/policies affect your business?  Just a few questions to start your business blogging today...and tomorrow.

 

 


This post is part of a regular series of client success stories.

Blogging for members, media and government leaders

Greater Boston Chamber of CommerceThe Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce launched their blog on September 20 and within 10 days, appeared on the first page of Google. Wow! How did that happen? According to Conor Yunits, communications manager, “We had a good plan ahead of time and content lined up to add to our blogs upon our launch to the press in September. Over the first few weeks we added that content, making sure it was relevant to our topics.” Try for yourself: To see Conor’s page one Google results, search Boston Chamber blog, Boston networking events or Boston public policy to see the blogs appear.

For more about our blogging software and to learn how blogging for search can help your organization's goals, be sure to visit the Compendium Blogware website and request a demo.


So here is an interesting paper presented by a company called Proofpoint that has done a study on organizations concern (justified) on the lack of control over employee blogs.

Although this study really focuses on outbound email some highlights are specifically relevant to business blogs:

More than 1 in 5 US companies surveyed (21.4%) investigated the exposure of confidential, sensitive or private information via a blog or message board posting. Nearly 1 in 5 (19.2%) US companies surveyed have disciplined an employee for violating blog or message board policies in the past 12 months. 9.1% reported terminating an employee for such a violation.

12.4% of US publicly-traded companies surveyed investigated the exposure of material fi nancial
information (such as unannounced quarterly results) via a blog or message board posting in the
past 12 months.

Blogs and message boards are also considered a signifi cant source of risk. 43.2% of compa-
nies surveyed expressed a high degree of concern about blog and message board postings
(43.7% for the largest companies surveyed).

The problem as I see it is twofold:

Most companies don’t give their employees the opportunity to blog within the Corporate environment. The reality in the world today is that many people are in fact passionate about where they work and what they do. This is a good thing!

But if these people don’t have a sanctioned outlet, then they naturally turn to one of the readily available blogging tools and express themselves on their own.

Without making this toooo commercial…..the answer is to incorporate an easy to use software system of corporate blogging that enables any one who wants to bog that outlet.

The second part of the problem is that the corporation needs a way to develop a workflow around this employee generated content. Look for systems that require approvals before any blog post goes live.

Given the right system of blogging control and compliance (along with Comment Control) having employees is a godsend. The more blogging an organization can solicit from their employees the better for Search Engine Optimization (SEO) and exposing a more ‘human’ side of their organization.